National Bank of Ukraine Econometric Model for the Assessment of Banks’ Credit Risk and Support Vector Machine Alternative
a National Bank of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine
Abstract

Econometric models of credit scoring started with the introduction of Altman’s simple z-model in 1968, but since then these models have become more and more sophisticated, some even use Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) and Support Vector Machine (SVM) techniques. This paper focuses on the use of SVM as a model for default prediction. I start with an introduction to SVM as well as to some of its widespread alternatives. Then, these different techniques are used to model NBU data on banks’ clients, which allows us to compare the accuracy of SVM to the accuracy of other models. While SVM is generally more accurate, I discuss some of the features of SVM that make its practical implementation controversial. I then discuss some ways for overcoming those features. I also present the results of the Logistic Regression (Logit) model which will be used by the NBU.

Publication History
Avaliable online 25 December 2015
372
views
159
downloads
Full Text
Citation
Cite as: Pokidin, D. (2015). National Bank of Ukraine Econometric Model for the Assessment of Banks’ Credit Risk and Support Vector Machine Alternative. Visnyk of the National Bank of Ukraine, 234, 52-72. https://doi.org/10.26531/vnbu2015.234.052
Citation Format

Metrics
References

Altman, E. (1968). Financial Ratios, Discriminant Analysis and the Prediction of Corporate Bankruptcy.

Auria, L., Moro, R. (2007). Credit Risk Assessment Revisited Methodological Issues and Practical Implications. Working Group On Risk Assessment, pp. 49-68.

Boser, B., Guyon, I., Vapnik, V. (1992). A training algorithm for optimal margin classiers. COLT '92: Proceedings of the fifth annual workshop on Computational learning theory, 144-152. https://doi.org/10.1145/130385.130401

Costeiu, A., Negu, F. (2013). Bridging the banking sector with the real economy a financial stability perspective. Working Paper Series, 1592. European Central Bank.

Doumpos, M., Zopodunis, C. (2009). Monotonic support vector machines for credit risk rating. New Mathematics and Natural Computation, 05(03), 557-570. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793005709001520

Fawcett, T. (2006). An Introduction to ROC Analysis. Pattern Recognition Letters, 27(8), 861-874. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patrec.2005.10.010

Hardle, W. K., Moro, R. A., Schafer, D. (2007). Estimating probabilities of default with support vector machines. SFB 649 Discussion Paper, 35. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1108117

Hosmer, D. W., Lemeshow, S. (2000). Applied Logistic Regression. New York: John Wiley & Sons. 

Kovahi, R. (1995). a study of cross validation and bootstrap for accuracy estimation and model selection. International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelelligence, 2, 1137-1143.

National Bank of Ukraine (2012). Directive, 23.

Ng, A. (2009). Support Vector Machines. Stanford University, CS229 Lecture notes. Retrieved from http://cs229.stanford.edu/notes/cs229-notes3.pdf

Pohar, M., Blas, M., Turk, S. (2004). Comparison of logistic regression and linear discriminant analysis: A simulation study. Metodološki Zvezki, 1(1), 143-161.

Pyle, D., San Jose, C.(2015). An executive's guide to machine learning. McKinsey Quarterly.

Venables, W. N., Ripley, B. D. (2002). Modern applied statistics with S. New York: Springer-Verlag.
 

Rights and Permissions
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material.
Submit Your Paper