International Experience of Capital Flows Liberalization
a Center for Economic Strategy, Kyiv, Ukraine

In this research we concentrate on such instruments of regulatory policy as restrictions for capital flow and currency regulation. The study highlights the international experience of managing capital flows, considers the consequences of policies to manage capital flows and currency regulation in the world, and summarizes the recommendations of international financial institutions in this regard.

Given the globalization of economic processes and the high level of openness in the Ukrainian economy, a strategic goal of currency regulation reform in the country has to be the gradual liberalization of capital flows. This is particularly observed in the Association Agreement with the EU and other documents. In order to take full advantage of liberalization and minimize the risks associated with volatile capital flows, it is necessary to implement a series of measures aimed at improving institutional capacity to manage the effects of both the inflow and outflow of capital in the intermediate stages of liberalization.

The approach generally corresponds to the Comprehensive Program for Financial Sector Development in Ukraine Until 2020, the IMF, and the Memorandum of Association Agreement between Ukraine and the EU.

Publication History
Avaliable online 30 March 2016
Full Text
Cite as: Repko, M., Kashko, O., Piontkivska, I. (2016). International Experience of Capital Flows Liberalization. Visnyk of the National Bank of Ukraine, 235, 26-42.
Citation Format


Arvai, Z. (2005). Capital account liberalization, capital flow patterns, and policy responses in the EU's new member states. Working Paper, 05-213. International Monetary Fund.

Bank of Thailand (2009). Capital flows in Thailand: Trends, Determinants and Implication for Central Bank Policies. February 2009. 

Capital Flows Management: Lessons from International Experience (2013). IMF and PBC Joint Conference Summaries and Presentations, Edited by Rodlauer M., N'Diaye P., March 2013.

Central Bank of Iceland (2011). Capital account liberalization strategy. Report to the Minister of Economic Affairs. 25 March 2011. Retrieved from

Chinn, M., Ito, H. (2015). The Chinn-Ito index – a de jure measure of financial openness. Retrieved from

Financial Regulation in the European Union (2016). Edited by Kattel R., Kregel J., Tonveronachi M. London: Routledge Taylor&Francis Group.

Edison, H. J., Reinhart, C. M. (2000). Capital controls during financial crises: The case of Malaysia and Thailand. International Finance Working Paper, 662.

Hartwell, C. (2014). If You're Going through Hell, Keep Going: Non-linear Effects of Financial Liberalization in Transition Economies. Institute for Emerging Markets Studies (IEMS).

IMF (2012a, 2013a, 2014). Annual Reports on Exchange Arrangements and Exchange Restrictions, various issues.

IMF (2012b). The liberalization and management of capital flows: an institutional view. Staff Policy Paper, 14.

IMF (2012c). Liberalizing capital flows and managing outflows. Staff Policy Paper. March 13, 2012. Retrieved from

IMF (2013 b). Guidance Note for the Liberalization and Management of Capital Flows.

IMF (2015), Iceland: Selected Issues. Country Report, 15-73.

Jongwanich, J., Socorro Gochoco-Bautista, M., Lee, J.-W. (2011). When are capital controls effective? Evidence from Malaysia and Thailand. Working Paper Series, 251. Asian Development Bank Economics.

Klein, M. (2012). Capital controls: gates versus walls. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity Fall 2012.

Kokoszczynski, R. (2001). From Fixed to Floating: Other Country Experiences: The Case of Poland. Paper to be presented at the IMF seminar Exchange Rate Regimes: Hard Peg or Free Floating? Washington, DC, March 19-20, 2001. Retrieved from

Kose, M. A., Prasad, E. (2012). Capital Accounts: Liberalize or Not? Finance&Development. Retrieved from

Krugman, P. (1998). An open letter to Prime Minister Mahathir. September 1, 1998. Retrieved from

Lauridsen, L. (1998). The Financial Crisis in Thailand: Causes, Conduct and Consequences? Retrieved from

Ma, G., McCauley, R. N. (2007). Do China's capital controls still bind? Implications for monetary autonomy and capital liberalisation. Working Paper, 233. Bank of International Settlements.

Ministry of Finance and Economic Affairs of Iceland (2015). Capital Accounts Liberalization Strategy. Retrieved from

Obstfeld, M. (2015). Trilemmas and Tradeoffs: Living with Financial Globalization. Retrieved from

Ostaszewski, P. (2013). Iceland – Political Implications of the Financial Crisis of 2008 and Road to Changes in the Economic Policy and in the Model of Democracy. Forum Scientiae Oeconomia, 1(1). Retrieved from

Saadi Sedik, T., Sun, T. (2012). Effects of Capital Flow Liberalization - What is the Evidence from Recent Experiences of Emerging Market Economies. Working Paper, 12-275. International Monetary Fund.

Saborowski, C., Sanya, S., Weisfeld, H., Yepez, J. (2014). Effectiveness of capital outflow restrictions. Working Paper, 14-8. International Monetary Fund.

Watanabe, K., Akama, H., Mifune, J. (2002). The Effectiveness of capital controls and monitoring: the case of non-internationalization of emerging market currencies. EMEAP Discussion Paper. Retrieved from

World Bank (2005). Financial liberalization: what went right, what went wrong? Chapter 7 in Economic Growth in the 1990s: Learning from a Decade of Reform. World Bank, Washington, DC.

Rights and Permissions
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material.
Submit Your Paper